The AWN wifi networks are the access points I am unable to see on the MT300N and would like to connect to. Here is the output of nmcli dev wifi on my laptop running Fedora 30: IN-USE SSID MODE CHAN RATE SIGNAL BARS SECURITYĪWN 409A-7 Infra 1 130 Mbit/s 100 ▂▄▆█. Perhaps the MT-300N finds the beacon for Kimpton_Meeting first, then goes down a rathole dealing with the multitude of other beacons coming from the Meraki base stations. However, it is being broadcast by the same base stations that are broadcasting the beacons for Kimpton and IHG Connect. Looking at the various SSIDs that the MT300N did find, note that Kimpton_Meeting network was always discovered every time it did a scan. One theory is that the MT300N WiFi driver gets confused when multiple SSIDs are being broadcast by individual Meraki base stations. There seems to be a bug in the GL-INET scanning algorithm that prevents discovery of these hotel networks, and others in the area. So my question: why does the MT300N not find the Kimpton or IHG Connect networks being broadcast by Meraki base stations? They were both operating on 2.4GHz and had strong signals, stronger than most of the networks that the scan did discover. The WiFi scanner reveals that the hotel’s network is using Cisco Meraki base stations. There were several operating at 2.4GHz and several at 5GHz. The scanner found multiple instances of Kimpton and IHG Connect base stations, each with different BSSIDs. Like many large hotels, the Kimpton has many access points installed all over the property. There were a great many 2.4GHz radios visible, well over a dozen. It is equipped with a WiFi scanner application which I used to scan the local WiFi environment. I had my MacBook Pro with me in the hotel. My iPhone indicated that those two networks were unlocked and both had a solid 3-bar signal, stronger than the various networks that the MT-300N did find. The first time I clicked Scan, this is what it found:īELL515, Dolphins-284, Kimpton_Meeting, Rosenman, SUPER_SAIYANĮvery time I clicked Scan, a different set of networks would appear.īut what never appeared were the two hotel networks available for guests to join: Kimpton and IHG Connect. My IPhone was able to see both of them, and join them. The hotel networks provided for guest access are Kimpton and IHG Connect. Some of them were 5GHz radios which the MT300N will not see. Using my iPhone, I scanned the WiFi environment, and it found lots of nearby networks. ![]() In fact, it failed to find many of the WiFi networks that were nearby. When scanning, it was unable to find the hotel’s WiFi networks. Unfortunately, the MT300N did not work as expected. On the weekend, I traveled to Toronto and stayed in a downtown hotel - the Kimpton, which is part of the large IHG chain (Holiday Inn, Intercontinental, etc). It works fine at home - I was able to connect my iPhone to its WiFi, scan for local WiFi networks (there are about a dozen nearby), select one of mine, and join it. It arrived with v2 firmware, and I promptly upgraded it to v3.012.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |